“Green” school prototype
February 4, 2010
Happy New Year bloggers.
Following on from my accreditation as a NZ Green Building Council accredited professional, I’ve set myself a goal this year to develop a prototype for a “green” four classroom block for a typical New Zealand school. This prototype will be developed using criteria and standards laid out in the Education tool developed by the NZGBC as well as good architectural practice and design. I am keen to develop this in conjunction with either a school that might be interested or a group of students that maybe interested in assisting as part of a school project. Let me know if you know anyone. In the meantime stay posted and I will give updates throughout this year.
Take care and have an AWESOME year.
Now an “green” building accredited professional!
November 11, 2009
I have now become an Accredited Professional of the NZ Green Building Council.
This means that I have achieved the necessary knowledge, skills and ability to lead a building project through the design and construction to achieve “green” – ecological, environmental and sustainable design – objectives.
If you have ever thought that you would like a healthy, low energy consuming and environmentally friendly home, school or office building, then you NEED to talk to me first.
Wanna build with out going over budget????
October 9, 2009
1. Start with a realistic budget and realistic expectations.
Building costs follow a very simple formula,
COST ($) = QUANTITY ($ per sq metre) X QUALITY (sq metres).
Use this at the beginning, and do not forget to add to this consent fees, landscape, driveway, fencing, and consultant’s fees. Then on top add a 15% contingency.
ALWAYS get a professional estimate (by a registered quantity surveyor) prepared, and believe and trust in it, believe me, they know more about building costs than you ever will, even if your brother in law once built a dog shed out the back of the house!!
Then use the estimate of cost as your cost plan.
2. Stick to your cost plan.
If you’ve budgeted $20,000 for a kitchen, then you can not afford the $40,000 model in the glossy magazine, unless you are prepared to increase your budget!
3. Changes.
Changing anything will have an affect on costs. I hate hearing clients say, “It won’t cost much to add… will it?” Do not delude yourself. If you must make changes, get a cost, and check against your budget/ cost plan.
4. Decisions.
Make as many decisions as you can as early as you can. Do not leave decisions to the last minute – it will add cost AND time to the project. Believe me if you can make every decision before starting, ie colours, hardware etc, you will actually relax and enjoy the whole building process. Sure there will be tweaks to be made, but nothing to cause problems.
5. Do not allow provisional sums.
In your price from the builder get them to commit actual sums of money, not provisional sums. If they need information from you, or someone else, to do that, then make sure they get it. Builders notoriously allow low provisional sums to get the job.
6. Get three prices.
Get three prices for everything, well at least all major items. Ensure your builder gets more than one price for all sub trades, supplies etc.
7. Allow a contingency sum.
Always allow a sum for the unexpected. When you are starting, just ball parking the project, add 20%. Then as you define the scope and detail further this can be reduced to 10%, and once ALL the decisions have been made 5% should be fine. Only use this for UNEXPECTED situations, like bad ground etc, not for a better bidet. If at the end of the job you haven’t spent it, then treat yourself. You will have earned it.
8. Communication.
The better the communication between builder, client, architect etc, the better the relationships. The better the relationships the less likely the job will go pear shaped. The biggest frustration for builders is clients either NOT having the decisions made or CHANGING decisions. Refer to items 3 and 4 above!!
While I can not guarantee absolute success following these, you definitely have a far greater chance of arriving at the end of the project with your budget and relationships intact, feeling relaxed and satisfied.
Want cheaper buildings with less hassle??
September 14, 2009
Recently I came across a document that supported what I, and I suspect may other architects, have known for a long time. That there has been a long term decline in design and documentation (drawings and specifications) quality which corresponds to a decrease in construction process efficiency, ie more cost, more time and more hassles with your builder. The reason for this decline was clearly shown to be due to clients and developers applying pressure for the reduction of design fees to minimise cost. The irony, shown in the report, is that overall the project is costing more and taking longer to complete with more likelihood of legal disputes caused by contractual problems.
The report prepared by the CSIRO in Australia, while prepared in 2001, is as valid, if not more, today as it was then. The report based on a survey in Australia of 327 construction companies and 491 design firms noted,
The decline in design and documentation quality standards was shown to be directly related to reduced … fee levels ….
It would appear, therefore, that the levels of fees being obtained may well be significantly below those required to provide good quality design and documentation services.
The survey concluded that the decline in design and documentation standards also corresponded to a decline in construction process efficiency. This can be gauged by the extent of the occurrence on non-desireable events in construction, such as rework, variations, cost overruns, extensions of time, delays, disputes and further requests for information.
The results showed that where design and documentation quality was shown to be very poor, there was an average increase of building cost of 11%, where the design and documentation quality was shown to be average, the increase was 2.5%, but where the design and documentation quality was shown to be excellent there was a decrease of over 1%.
The report concluded,
Once clients and developers fully understand the value of quality design and documentation, it is hoped they would then ensure that project briefs are clear, concise and consistent, and that sufficent time and fees are available to allow designers to do their jobs properly. The benefit would be more projects completed on time, within budget and with a reduced likelihood of legal action caused by contractual disputes.
Green and Healthy Schools part 2
September 3, 2009
So what is a green and healthy school?
A green building, or sustainable building is an outcome of a design process which focuses on increasing the efficient use of resources. This includes energy, water, and materials while reducing the ecological impact on the environment. Further a healthy building is one that, provides a healthy indoor environment through the proper level and quality of natural ventilation, air quality, thermal comfort, natural daylight, and the reduction in use of potentially inappropriate materials.
So how do we know if a building design is “green”?
The NZ Green Building Council has developed a number of rating tools that allows users and designers to set goals – what” shade of green” you consider to be appropriate. A number of criteria are used, against which a level of compliance is assessed and points credited. The more points overall the higher the rating. The criteria are as follows, Management, Indoor Air Quality, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Land Use and Ecology, Emissions and Innovation.
The total points credited is collated, and a Green Star rating assessed. While formal certification from the NZ Green Building Council is only available for 4, 5 and 6 star ( above 45 points), there are still substantial environmental performance benefits to be achieved from lower levels.
To become “green” we do not have to grow our hair and become hippies, living in earth buildings, making macrame hangers. Substantial benefits can be obtained by simple straight forward design decisions, that, while the building will not appear any different, will provide a higher quality environment for its users and contribute greatly to the welfare of our planet.
Green and healthy schools
August 24, 2009
Ever since I completed a special course in sustainable design at University for an autonomous house (i.e. nothing in, nothing out) I have held a fascination for low energy healthy buildings; now called green design, or environmentally sustainable design. Further as my architectural practice has become more and more involved in school buildings, I have held this hidden desire to design a green school.
It seems to me that it is incredibly important that the environment, both indoor and outdoor, in which our children are educated is conducive to learning; both in terms of a healthy place, and improved student performance.
A report carried out in the USA in October 2006, noted
Greening school design provides an extraordinary cost-effective way to enhance student learning.
Green school use an average of 33% less energy….
Some green schools are built on the same budget as conventional schools.
17 separate studies all found positive health impacts from improved indoor air-quality, ranging from 13.5% up to 87% improvement.
Greening school design is extraordinarily cost-effective compared with other available measures to enhance student performance
Why aren’t we doing it for every school building project??
It’s what we do…
January 27, 2009
Organising a new building is one of the most stressful activities that anyone can undertake. It is important that you choose people to work with who you can trust, and develop a good and honest working relationship with, people who will bring considerable creativity, experience and knowledge to the project, and people who will take the time to listen and understand your needs and budget constraints and who can use this creativity experience and knowledge to your best advantage.